Korea Sets a 240-Day Clock on MFDS Device Approval
MFDS plans to cut device review to 240 days and ease change approvals — a signal that Korea is shedding its slow-market reputation.
What Happened
The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), Korea's medicines and medical-device regulator, has set a target to run "the world's fastest" product approval system. In its 2026 administrative plan, reported by Minister Oh Yu-kyoung, MFDS said it will cut review periods that ran as long as 420 days for biosimilars down to 240 days, applying the target across new drugs and medical devices.
The mechanics are procedural, not cosmetic. MFDS plans deeper pre-submission reviews to improve data completeness, parallel review of assessment items rather than sequential ones, dedicated review teams, and more face-to-face consultations. It will add an "AI Approval and Review Support System" to summarise and translate submitted data and draft review documents.
Two structural changes matter most for device makers. MFDS will shift to a negative-list change-approval system, requiring pre-approval only for changes that affect a device's safety or performance, with other modifications managed by the company. And it will introduce self-certification of performance for digital medical and health-support devices.
This sits on top of a separate January 2026 reform, the "Market Immediate Entry Medical Technology" system, which lets devices that clear MFDS's reinforced clinical evaluation skip the separate New Medical Technology Assessment and reach hospitals in as little as 80 days, down from up to 490, across 199 device categories.
Why It Matters
Korea has long been a procedure-heavy market with two distinct bottlenecks: MFDS approval, then a market-access assessment before clinical use. Korea is now compressing both ends at once.
For Swiss and European companies, the negative-list change system is the quiet headline. Iterative digital and AI-enabled devices previously risked re-approval on minor updates; limiting pre-approval to safety- or performance-relevant changes lowers a real lifecycle cost. Self-certification for digital-device performance removes another familiar friction for SaMD firms.
The trade-off is evidence. The fast lane is reserved for devices that pass an "internationally enhanced clinical evaluation." Faster timelines raise, not lower, the bar on the clinical package, and European data may need bridging for Korean review.
What to Watch
Whether the 240-day figure actually holds for medical devices. The headline number comes from the biosimilar track, and device reviews may compress more slowly.
How "changes affecting safety or performance" are defined in practice. That definition decides how much lifecycle burden genuinely falls for AI and software devices.
Whether the digital self-certification route is recognised only by MFDS, or also carries weight with payers. Approval speed means little without a matching reimbursement path through HIRA.
Key Takeaway
Korea is compressing both stages of its device pipeline — MFDS review toward 240 days and post-approval entry toward 80 — but the entry ticket is a stronger clinical-evidence package. European MedTech should treat Korea as a faster market in 2026 while budgeting for Korea-specific or bridged clinical data.